Feb 16, 2026 - Liturgical Calendar Sabotage and the King in DisguiseI would like to file an official protest with the Liturgical Calendar Department.
Because this year—this year—Lent begins before my birthday.
Which is a rude little scheduling choice, honestly. I was planning to enter the fast like a mature Orthodox Christian, fortified by cake and emotionally stable. Instead, the Church calendar has pulled a classic move: it has ambushed my frosting.
Naturally, my husband and I did what any sane people do when we realize repentance is arriving early and joy must be stockpiled:
We launched a preemptive feast campaign.
Friday night: a small French table—warm light, good bread, the kind of meal that makes you forget the internet exists.
Saturday: Italy—full feast cooked by Mr. Wonderful, the whole house smelling like consolation.
France, then Italy. A gastronomic tour of Europe.
And yes, dear Protestant friends who receive this email: Orthodox Christians have a Sunday that is basically called Meatfare (yes, really), which sounds like a county fair sponsored by brisket and regret. It’s not… exactly that. But I admit the branding is bold.
Anyway. We feasted.
Then Sunday morning arrived, and the Gospel walked into the room like a monk with a flashlight and absolutely no patience for our spiritual cosmetics.
Matthew 25.
The Last Judgment.
Not the sort of reading that pairs naturally with espresso and leftover tiramisu—unless your idea of “cozy” includes the fear of God and a hard truth served hot.
In Matthew 25, Christ does not ask about your spiritual aesthetic.
He doesn’t ask if you were “informed.”
He doesn’t ask if you were “right.”
He doesn’t ask if you performed holiness with good lighting.
He asks something terrifyingly concrete:
“I was hungry.”
“I was thirsty.”
“I was a stranger.”
“I was naked.”
“I was sick.”
“I was in prison.”
And you either came close…or you didn’t.
The Church places this Gospel right here, right before the fast, because she is wise. She knows how quickly I can turn Lent into a scoreboard.
Give me one rule and I will start measuring my worth by legumes before the kettle boils.
But Lent is not God’s self-improvement program.
It is an emptying—not to make us impressive, but to make us free.
Free enough to love.
This Gospel will not let us keep Jesus safely “spiritual.”
Christ identifies Himself with the hungry, the thirsty, the stranger, the naked, the sick, the imprisoned—not as a metaphor, but as an encounter.
The question isn’t only, “Do I love Jesus?”
It’s also: “Do I recognize where He is standing?”
And—if I’m honest—He is often standing where I would prefer He not stand.
He is standing in the interruption.
The inconvenient conversation.
The person who can’t repay me.
The one who is lonely and doesn’t know how to say it without sounding needy.
The one whose suffering has made them difficult.
St. Silouan the Athonite gives us a line so simple it’s almost unbearable: “My brother is my life.” Not “my brother is my project.” Not “my brother is my lesson.” Not “my brother is my political category.” My brother—my neighbor—my life.
That’s what Matthew 25 is pressing into us: this person in front of you is not “in the way.” This person is a way—more accurately, the way Christ has chosen to come to you.
Here’s the scene I keep seeing in my mind this week.
It’s Oregon. It’s raining the way it always rains: not dramatic, not cinematic—just steady, insistent, holy-annoying rain. Moss climbing everything like it has a job. Fir trees standing there like they’ve seen every human drama and are unimpressed.
You come home, stomp your boots at the door, shrug off your wet jacket, and you want—more than anything—quiet. Candles. A book. A small, well-earned peace.
And then your phone buzzes.
Someone needs you.
Not in a heroic way. Not in a “this will make a great story later” way. In a small, costly way that doesn’t sparkle: a ride, a visit, a meal, a “can you sit with me,” a “can you listen,” a “can you come.”
This is where Lent actually begins: not in the pantry, but at the threshold of love.
The genius of the Church is that she won’t let us start Lent in fantasy.
She places Matthew 25 in our hands like a mirror.
Because you can fast with precision and still be cruel.
You can pray and still be hard.
You can attend services and still quietly refuse the neighbor.
This is why one of the Fathers (often paraphrased in our tradition) warns us in plain language: if we cannot recognize Christ in the suffering person, we will not magically recognize Him by religious correctness alone.
The sheep in the Gospel are not preening. They’re surprised.
“Lord, when did we see You…?”
That tells us something important: this isn’t about grand gestures or spiritual theatrics.
It’s about what kind of person grace is shaping you into.
The kind who notices.
The kind who moves.
The kind who has been trained—by repentance, by prayer, by small obediences—to see Christ in the human being placed in your path.
Dorotheos of Gaza gives a picture that helps: he says we are like points on a circle with God at the center. As we move toward God, we also move closer to each other. Love of God and love of neighbor are not two separate projects; they are one road.
Matthew 25 is that road, paved in ordinary mercy.
A meal.
A cup of water.
A welcome.
A visit.
A coat.
A chair pulled up beside a bed.
The world is full of suffering we cannot fix. Matthew 25 does not ask us to fix everything.
It asks something smaller—and therefore more terrifying:
Will you love the person God has actually given you?
Not abstract humanity.
Not a cause you can support from a safe distance.
Not your imaginary “future self” with infinite energy and perfect boundaries.
This person.
This moment.
This chance.
Here is my honest prayer as Lent arrives early and my birthday cake dreams quietly die:
Lord, do not let me practice avoidance.
Do not let me become the kind of person who can keep my life tidy by keeping people at arm’s length.
Give me the courage of small mercy—the kind no one claps for—the kind that costs time, attention, and ego.
Because the Kingdom of God does not come to us only in ideas.
It comes disguised as a person.
Fr. Alexander Schmemann reminds us that the criterion of Christ’s judgment is love—not abstract concern, not ideological sorting, but concrete, personal love for the human person God places in our path.
He warns us not to confuse the Church’s mission with becoming a mere “social agency,” because Christian love is something more mysterious and more personal: it is seeing Christ in the particular person before us—right now.
“When Christ comes to judge us, what will be the criterion of His judgment? The parable answers: love—not a mere humanitarian concern for abstract justice and the anonymous ‘poor,’ but concrete and personal love for the human person, any human person, that God makes me encounter in my life.
Christian love is the ‘possible impossibility’ to see Christ in another man, whoever he is, and whom God, in His eternal and mysterious plan, has decided to introduce into my life, be it only for a few moments…
There is no ‘impersonal’ love because love is the wonderful discovery of the ‘person’ in ‘man,’ of the personal and unique in the common and general…
Thus, on whether or not we have accepted this responsibility—on whether we have loved or refused to love—shall we be judged” (Great Lent: Journey to Pascha).
Here we begin—no spiritual swagger, no gloomy perfectionism, no diet dressed up as holiness.
We begin with a simple, sobering request:
Lord, give me eyes that see You—especially when You come to me in a person I did not plan for.
Glory to God for all things.
— Perpetua




